<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Centres</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/2" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/2</id>
<updated>2013-05-21T23:58:24Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-21T23:58:24Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Entrepreneurial Aspiration and Flexibility of Small and Medium-Sized Firms</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8679" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cao, Yangfeng</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ping Li, Peter</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Skat-Rørdam, Peter</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8679</id>
<updated>2013-04-22T09:43:39Z</updated>
<published>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Entrepreneurial Aspiration and Flexibility of Small and Medium-Sized Firms
Cao, Yangfeng; Ping Li, Peter; Skat-Rørdam, Peter
Primarily due to the large gaps in economic and institutional contexts between&#13;
the developed and emerging markets, business model innovation (BMI) at the&#13;
subsidiary level plays an important role for the success of small and mediumsized&#13;
firms (SMEs) from the developed markets operating in the emerging&#13;
markets as top-down venture. While some studies claim that the direct&#13;
involvement of headquarters (HQ) of SMEs in the activities of their subsidiaries&#13;
is essential, surprisingly little is known about how HQ specifically facilitates BMI&#13;
at the subsidiary level, especially in the context of top-down venture. Adopting&#13;
the method of comparative and longitudinal case study, we tracked the BMI&#13;
process of six SMEs from Denmark operating in China. The emergent&#13;
framework indicates that entrepreneurial aspiration and flexibility at the HQ level&#13;
2&#13;
Asia Research Centre, CBS, Copenhagen Discussion Paper 2013-42&#13;
are two primary facilitators of BMI at the subsidiary level via the mechanisms of&#13;
commitment and cooperation. We also found that BMI performance would&#13;
influence the two facilitators in a feedback loop. Hence, we can contribute to the&#13;
literatures on international entrepreneurship and strategic entrepreneurship by&#13;
integrating the two previously separated research streams via their shared&#13;
theme of accelerated learning. In particular, this study helps solve the puzzle&#13;
concerning fast and successful international venture.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>What are the Sources of Leader Charisma?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8659" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>cao, Yangfeng</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Zhang, Kai</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Luo, Wenhao</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8659</id>
<updated>2013-02-21T14:52:06Z</updated>
<published>2013-02-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">What are the Sources of Leader Charisma?
cao, Yangfeng; Zhang, Kai; Luo, Wenhao
This study aims to put forward a new concept in charismatic leadership&#13;
theory: source of leader charisma (SLC). Using an inductive approach, we&#13;
identified the various dimensions of SLC in the Chinese context, and found that&#13;
SLC comprises of charismatic personality and charismatic behaviors.&#13;
Charismatic personality consists of three dimensions: high morality, outstanding&#13;
talents, and attractive characteristics. Charismatic behavior also includes three&#13;
dimensions: visional inspiration, character development, and morale stimulation.&#13;
Finally, we developed a primary model to explore the mechanism by which the&#13;
SLCs are attributed to charisma by follower. Our findings in the present study&#13;
contribute to new evidence that charismatic leadership theory may transcend&#13;
cultural boundaries.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-02-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8657" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Strand, Robert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Freeman, R. Edward</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8657</id>
<updated>2013-02-21T14:29:10Z</updated>
<published>2013-02-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage
Strand, Robert; Freeman, R. Edward
In this article we clarify the historical roots of stakeholder theory to establish that a much larger&#13;
role was played by Scandinavian thinkers in its development than is currently acknowledged.&#13;
We show that important contributions to the stakeholder concept were being made by Eric&#13;
Rhenman and his Scandinavian contemporaries in parallel to the contributions from the Stanford&#13;
Research Institute (SRI) in the early 1960s and thereafter and thus are not a “historical trail” as&#13;
they are currently labeled. Therefore we offer a significant modification to the historical&#13;
narrative as presented in Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Freeman, 1984).&#13;
These important Scandinavian contributions include the first publication and description of the&#13;
expression „stakeholder‟ in management literature accessible to scholars throughout the world&#13;
and the introduction of the first stakeholder map to the management literature.&#13;
We use this occasion to consider potential relationships between these early Scandinavian&#13;
contributions to the stakeholder concept with current practices of well-known Scandinavian&#13;
companies. Through this we contend the evidence suggests relationships worthy of further&#13;
considerations. We conclude by endorsing the expression “Scandinavian cooperative advantage”&#13;
through which we intend to provoke increased attention from beyond Scandinavia. Cooperation&#13;
between companies and their stakeholders is increasingly recognized as necessary for the social&#13;
and environmental sustainability of world and the long-term profitability of companies where we&#13;
contend inspiration for such cooperation may be prosperously drawn from Scandinavia.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-02-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Political Economy of Agrarian Crisis and Slow Industrialization in India</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8642" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bhattacharyya, Sudipta</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Abraham, Mathew</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>D’Costa, Anthony</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8642</id>
<updated>2013-01-29T09:19:28Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Political Economy of Agrarian Crisis and Slow Industrialization in India
Bhattacharyya, Sudipta; Abraham, Mathew; D’Costa, Anthony
This paper uses the structuralist framework of agriculture-industry synergy in an&#13;
economy to discuss the performance of the agricultural and industrial sectors in&#13;
India. The industry – agriculture relationship is argued to be integral to&#13;
economic development as the agriculture sector supplies raw materials, surplus&#13;
labour to the industrial sector and acts as a source of demand for industrial&#13;
goods. However, in India this relationship has been complex. This paper looks&#13;
at the supply side constraints in the agricultural sector and the demand side&#13;
constraints in the industrial sector to assess the poor development and growth&#13;
in the two sectors. It concludes that India has not followed the structuralist&#13;
pattern of sectoral development and poor agricultural growth has not been&#13;
conducive for demand led industrialization, adversely affecting factor markets&#13;
for both labour and land.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
