<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Ph.D. theses (AA/ACC)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/68" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/68</id>
<updated>2013-06-20T11:05:29Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-06-20T11:05:29Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The construction of social and environmental reporting</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8667" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kaspersen, Mia</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8667</id>
<updated>2013-04-05T06:31:20Z</updated>
<published>2013-03-13T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The construction of social and environmental reporting
Kaspersen, Mia
The overall purpose of this thesis is to examine how and why internal processes,&#13;
systems, and structures influence the construction of social and environmental&#13;
reports. The three papers that are included in this thesis approach this research&#13;
objective from three different but interrelated perspectives. Each of these&#13;
perspectives is an essential aspect of reporting practices. By conducting case&#13;
studies and including organisational members who participate in social and&#13;
environmental reporting (SER) processes (Adams and Whelan, 2009; Farneti and&#13;
Guthrie, 2009), this thesis strives to contribute to increased knowledge regarding&#13;
organisational reporting behaviours and the construction of SER (Laine, 2009;&#13;
Parker, 2007; Thomson and Bebbington, 2005; Adams, 2004; Gray, 2005; Adams&#13;
and Larrinaga-González, 2007; Tilt, 2006; O'Dwyer, 2005b; Spence and Rinaldi,&#13;
2012; O'Dwyer et al., 2011; Tregidga et al., 2012b). Thus, by attempting to ‘look&#13;
inside organisations’ and by emphasising the role of the organisational context, the&#13;
three articles of this thesis provide insights into details regarding 1) the reporting&#13;
environment and audit trail; 2) the role of stakeholder engagement in SER; and 3)&#13;
why certain impacts of organisational activities are included (or excluded) in&#13;
social and environmental reports. The three papers addressing these topics have&#13;
been motivated by an aspiration to establish a more nuanced understanding of the&#13;
current state of SER.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-03-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Auditor’s going-concern reporting</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8490" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sormunen, Nina</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8490</id>
<updated>2012-08-16T11:43:37Z</updated>
<published>2012-08-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Auditor’s going-concern reporting
Sormunen, Nina
The going-concern context has been the subject of much research and&#13;
discussion for many years at both academic and professional levels. The&#13;
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 570 stipulates that the auditor&#13;
should consider the appropriateness of managements’ use of the goingconcern&#13;
assumption and to evaluate whether there are material&#13;
uncertainties with respect to entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.&#13;
Regardless of what is stated in the financial statement, the auditor should&#13;
comment on going-concern uncertainty in the audit report if there is a&#13;
doubt about firm’s ability to continue as a going concern. There is strong&#13;
evidence that the auditor’s going-concern decision is a complex task with&#13;
extensive consequences. The primary purpose of this thesis is to&#13;
empirically provide significant basis to get better understanding of the&#13;
challenging nature of the auditor’s going-concern reporting. This thesis&#13;
deals with different aspects of auditor’s going-concern reporting and&#13;
contributes mainly to the line of auditing research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-08-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Customer Profitability Measurement Models</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8437" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Holm, Morten</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8437</id>
<updated>2012-04-10T12:12:26Z</updated>
<published>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Customer Profitability Measurement Models
Holm, Morten
The purpose of this dissertation is to expand our understanding of the&#13;
applicability and performance effects of different Customer Profitability&#13;
Measurement (CPM) models across contexts.&#13;
Customer profitability measurement has attracted increasing interest recently&#13;
– mainly in the marketing literature. The vast majority of this research has been&#13;
case-based. Consequently, the evidence in this field consists of a number of case&#13;
demonstrations indicating that using CPM models can be beneficial in specific&#13;
industries but only very limited cross-sectional research investigating the general&#13;
relationships between the CPM model use, context and firm financial&#13;
performance.&#13;
Researching these relationships is expected to contribute to marketing as well&#13;
as management accounting literatures but also to managers working with or&#13;
planning to start working with CPM models in practice for two reasons: First,&#13;
marketing managers are increasingly required to be accountable for the marketing&#13;
investments they expect to make. A better understanding of which CPM models&#13;
that are applicable in different contexts will contribute to more efficient resource&#13;
utilization in firms. Second, the management accounting literature on CPM&#13;
models is very scarce despite the fact that this area is a key priority in practice.&#13;
Knowledge on how CPM models are adapted to fit the environment in which the&#13;
firm operates will contribute to our understanding of how CPM models should be&#13;
designed but also to the general school of contingency-based management&#13;
accounting research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Decision usefulness of goodwill reported under IFRS</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8398" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stenheim, Tonny</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8398</id>
<updated>2012-03-09T13:07:55Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Decision usefulness of goodwill reported under IFRS
Stenheim, Tonny
The dissertation investigates the decision usefulness of goodwill-accounting numbers. Theory and methodology from value relevance, earnings-management and corporate-governance literature are employed in order to investigate the decision usefulness. The dissertation compares the value relevance of goodwill reported under the impairment-only method (current IFRS) with the value relevance of goodwill reported under alternative accounting methods. It also investigates the extent to which goodwill-impairment losses under IFRS are associated with variables for economic impairment and/or earnings-management incentives. And finally, it investigates whether an estimate of misrepresentation of economic impairment in goodwill is associated with earnings-management incentives and/or corporate-governance mechanisms. The results suggest that the impairment-only method provides accounting numbers that more faithfully depict economic fundamentals as reflected in stock prices. The results also suggest that reported goodwill-impairment losses are not strongly affected by earnings-management incentives. Still, misrepresentation of economic impairment in goodwill does not seem to be constrained by corporate-governance mechanisms. In overall, these findings support the recently implemented impairment-only method under current IFRS
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
