<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Ph.D. theses (ECON)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/70" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/70</id>
<updated>2013-06-20T05:36:58Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-06-20T05:36:58Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Essays on Family Firms</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8607" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Zhou, Haoyong</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8607</id>
<updated>2012-12-21T09:04:02Z</updated>
<published>2012-12-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Essays on Family Firms
Zhou, Haoyong
The dissertation examines corporate performance and capital structure of family firms,&#13;
contributing to the limited empirical research on family firms. Family firms are prevalent in&#13;
national economies all over the world. It is the prevalence that makes family firms receive&#13;
increasing attentions from academia. The dissertation consists of an introduction and three&#13;
chapters. Each chapter is an independent paper. The first chapter is a joint work with Professor&#13;
Morten Bennedsen and Dr. Markus Ampenberger. The version of in the dissertation will be&#13;
published as Chapter 6 in the forthcoming Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance by&#13;
Oxford University Press. The second paper and third paper are single-authored papers.&#13;
In the first chapter, we discuss the capital structure of family firms, with a focus on the debtequity&#13;
mix. Two parts comprise the chapter. In the first part, we provide a literature review on&#13;
existing theoretical and empirical research in the capital structure of family firms. The literature&#13;
review shows that the most important theories to explain capital structure in family firms seem to&#13;
be risk aversion, agency theory, and control considerations. We argue that risk aversion and&#13;
control considerations have opposing impacts on the optimal choice of debt leverage of family&#13;
firms. On one hand, controlling families of family firms are typically non-diversified investors&#13;
with most of their wealth and human capital tied to the company and consequently family firms&#13;
use less debt. On the other hand, controlling families want to maintain the control over their&#13;
companies. This control consideration restricts the willingness to raise new equity outside the&#13;
family and therefore often lead to a stronger dependence on banks and other debt instruments.&#13;
The literature review also shows that evidence on capital structure choices of family firms is&#13;
inconclusive. Large-scale evidence on private family firms is almost missing.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-12-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Empirical Essays in International Trade</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8541" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fosse, Henrik Barslund</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8541</id>
<updated>2012-10-11T09:10:34Z</updated>
<published>2012-10-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Empirical Essays in International Trade
Fosse, Henrik Barslund
The thesis consists of an introduction followed by three numbered chapters (independent&#13;
papers). It covers topics in international trade, and in di¤erent ways the thesis investigates&#13;
aspects of heterogeneity. The  rst chapter is coauthored with Pascalis Raimondos-Møller. The&#13;
version of this chapter is published in the CESifo Working Paper Series and serves as the&#13;
 nal background paper for the compressed journal article published in Review of Development&#13;
Economics, May 2012. The second chapter is coauthored with Madhura Maitra, senior PhD&#13;
student at Columbia University at the time. The third chapter is a solo paper.&#13;
In the  rst chapter we introduce a traditional macro model of trade and change the com-&#13;
petitive environment by introducing state-owned enterprises. We also include heterogenous&#13;
households to analyze e¤ects on the income distribution. The chapter focuses on Vietnam s&#13;
accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2007. Upon entry, Vietnam was granted&#13;
an accession period lasting till 2014. During this period tari¤s would have to fall according&#13;
to the accession agreement. This  rst chapter evaluates this 2007-2014 trade liberalization by&#13;
building an applied general equilibrium model and calibrating it to the Vietnamese data. The&#13;
model pays careful attention to the fact that Vietnam has many state-owned enterprises that&#13;
do not behave in a pro t maximizing way. The model simulations show that the WTO imposed&#13;
tari¤ reforms will reduce the overall welfare level of the Vietnamese households. Moreover, the&#13;
biggest loss of income will take place among the poor rural households in Vietnam. We propose&#13;
other tari¤ reforms that both raise overall welfare and reduce income inequality.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-10-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Corporate Profit Shifting and the Multinational Enterprise</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8457" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Webber, Stuart</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8457</id>
<updated>2012-07-10T12:06:00Z</updated>
<published>2012-06-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Corporate Profit Shifting and the Multinational Enterprise
Webber, Stuart
This dissertation analyzes ways in which Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) shift profits from&#13;
one country to another to reduce their income tax expense. This is an important topic for a&#13;
number of reasons. From a country’s perspective, its income tax rates and policies can have a&#13;
significant impact upon its tax revenue, economic competitiveness, and the vibrancy of its&#13;
economy. From the MNE’s perspective, income tax rates and policies determine a firm’s tax&#13;
obligations, and thus affect net income and enterprise value. The dissertation examines several&#13;
ways in which MNEs shift profits to reduce income taxes, and consists of five chapters.&#13;
The introductory chapter reviews the economic evidence demonstrating firms shift profits from&#13;
one country to another in response to tax rates. In the past two decades a number of economic&#13;
studies have shown firms use tax and accounting techniques to shift reported profits to low tax&#13;
jurisdictions, and that chapter reviews key articles that have demonstrated this. The second&#13;
paper explains how MNEs finance international investments to shift interest income to low-tax&#13;
jurisdictions. It reviews government tax policies in a number of countries that have been enacted&#13;
to limit interest income shifting, and recommends an approach to control this activity. The third&#13;
paper examines tax efficient supply chains, in which tax departments and supply chain&#13;
organizations collaborate to site business operations to achieve supply chain objectives and&#13;
reduce tax obligations. The fourth chapter analyzes how some U.S.-headquartered firms have&#13;
moved their corporate headquarters from the U.S. to tax havens, to reduce their tax expense and&#13;
avoid U.S. international tax policies. The fifth and final chapter examines new U.S. tax&#13;
regulations that propose to value intellectual property transfers in the same way outside investors&#13;
would, which the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) calls its “investor model.” It also makes&#13;
recommendations concerning how the investor model can be improved.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-06-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Essays on Empirical Corporate Finance</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8451" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Amore, Mario Daniele</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8451</id>
<updated>2012-05-29T07:32:43Z</updated>
<published>2012-05-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Essays on Empirical Corporate Finance
Amore, Mario Daniele
The effect of corporate governance and managers on the value of companies has&#13;
received great attention in the recent public debate. In the academic research, this&#13;
increased attention has been associated with an effort to develop finer conceptual&#13;
frameworks and analytical techniques to assess how governance and financial&#13;
characteristics influence corporate policies and profitability.&#13;
While theoretical models represent a successful approach under specific&#13;
hypotheses, the econometric analysis of corporate governance and managerial&#13;
characteristics has proven to be extremely challenging. Because governance and&#13;
managerial characteristics are equilibrium outcomes largely determined by the firm&#13;
itself, it is methodologically difficult to separate out their determinants from their&#13;
consequences to infer causal effects. Since its infancy the empirical corporate&#13;
governance and corporate finance research has faced this problem, which is often&#13;
responsible for mixed empirical results.&#13;
In my dissertation, I adopt a common methodological framework developed in&#13;
the “program evaluation” literature to shed new light on the effects of governance and&#13;
managerial characteristics on a variety of corporate policies and, ultimately, firm&#13;
performance. In particular, I estimate a class of difference-in-differences models&#13;
deriving the empirical identifications from policy changes that generate “quasi-natural&#13;
experiments”.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-05-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
