<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Ph.D. theses (INO)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/76" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/76</id>
<updated>2013-05-18T11:31:11Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-18T11:31:11Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Coworker Influence and Labor Mobility</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8654" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Isakson, Christine D.</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8654</id>
<updated>2013-02-07T08:57:42Z</updated>
<published>2013-02-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Coworker Influence and Labor Mobility
Isakson, Christine D.
It is critically important to understand the connection between social interaction&#13;
and individual economic choice (Granovetter 2005). This thesis asks the overall&#13;
question; How do social relations, specifically coworkers, in the organizational&#13;
context, influence individual economic choice? The three economic outcomes&#13;
being examined are turnover, entrepreneurship (the choice to start a business or&#13;
firm) and location choice (the choice of where to live). These three economic&#13;
choices are linked to social relations in the organizational context by examining&#13;
different facets of coworker or peer influence. Common to all papers are mechanisms&#13;
pertaining to communication, knowledge transfer and coworker influence.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-02-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The evolution of innovation strategy</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8453" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stjernholm Madsen, Arne</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8453</id>
<updated>2012-07-10T12:23:13Z</updated>
<published>2012-05-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The evolution of innovation strategy
Stjernholm Madsen, Arne
Increased globalization in business competition makes the ability to innovate and to redefine&#13;
strategy crucial to a company. An interesting question however is if a management team can control&#13;
innovation and strategic renewal of the company at all; or do such changes emerge, driven by&#13;
external events or by bottom-up processes in the organization? The present research project&#13;
addresses some of these issues through the overall research question “How does innovation strategy&#13;
evolve?”&#13;
The research question is examined in a specific empirical context. Since 2001, I have worked as an&#13;
internal innovation consultant at Novo Nordisk A/S; a pharmaceutical firm founded in 1923&#13;
operating in a well established industry (insulin for diabetes treatment), characterized by intensive&#13;
investments in Research and Development. I took advantage of this unique access to the internal life&#13;
of an organization and consequently set up my research project as a longitudinal in-depth case study&#13;
of the medical device innovation activities at Novo Nordisk A/S covering the period 1980-2008. The&#13;
study specifically analyzes the relationship between the classic core product of the firm (insulin) and&#13;
complementary products (medical devices, such as insulin ‘pens’), which hold the potential to either&#13;
enhance the value of the core product, or to become a distinct business of its own.&#13;
Burgelman’s evolutionary theory of strategy making, especially his ‘internal ecology model’&#13;
(Burgelman 1991, 2002), has been chosen as the basic theoretical framework for the project. Some&#13;
expansions of this framework, however, were needed. First, the present study puts greater emphasis&#13;
on analyzing the external environment and its influence on internal strategy processes. Second, the&#13;
analysis includes the role of management cognition, especially the notion of the corporate dominant&#13;
logic (Prahalad &amp; Bettis, 1986; Bettis &amp; Prahalad, 1995), understood as an enduring top management&#13;
worldview or mindset based on reinforcement of experiences from the past.&#13;
With regard to results, the present study identifies a more entrepreneurial role of the top&#13;
management driven induced strategy process than traditionally described in evolutionary theory. In&#13;
this case study, strategic variation and trial-and-error learning is not restricted to the autonomous&#13;
initiatives in the ‘internal ecology’; on the contrary, top management cognition creates strategic&#13;
visions or hypotheses, which are enacted as experiments in the market, for example in the form of&#13;
new product categories. External feedback determines the destiny of these strategic experiments.&#13;
Thereby innovation strategy (in case, for medical devices) serves as a strategic laboratory at&#13;
corporate level, so to speak.&#13;
The device-based strategic experiments face the challenge of escaping the gravity of the dominant&#13;
logic, which repeatedly pulls the strategy back towards the well-known success formula, centered on&#13;
the drug itself (i.e. the insulin). Thus, the induced strategy process mediates core assets&#13;
(pharmaceutical drugs) and complementary assets (medical devices), by swinging the pendulum&#13;
between cycles of innovation strategy which define the devices as core or complementary respectively. Hence, the balance between what is defined as core and what is defined as&#13;
complementary in the corporate innovation strategy seems to be dynamic and negotiable.&#13;
As a consequence of the cycles of strategic experimentation, the corporate induced strategy process&#13;
acts as a force of strategic entrepreneurship, seen over extended time.&#13;
The implications for research point towards a new paradigm of strategic research in the ‘middle&#13;
ground’ between rational choice theory and evolutionary theory, as proposed by Gavetti &amp; Levinthal&#13;
(2004). The present research project suggests that a firm’s ability for strategic adaptation depends&#13;
both on strategic context determination of autonomous initiatives in the ‘internal ecology’ and on&#13;
ability to enact induced strategic experiments with alternating innovation strategies in the market.&#13;
This theory of ‘inbound’ and ‘outbound’ strategic search establishes a dynamic understanding of the&#13;
corporate induced strategy process. In this understanding, innovation strategies act as hypotheses,&#13;
which create strategic dissonance between vision and reality and thereby drive strategic learning.&#13;
The implications for management practice are first recognition of how fortunate it has been for&#13;
Novo Nordisk to sustain the core business strategy, protected by the dominant logic. This fact relates&#13;
to a background where the core market proved to hold immense growth potential, and the industry&#13;
was relatively stable compared to for instance the IT industry. On the other hand, Novo Nordisk’s&#13;
success is partly due to cycles of strategic experiments with complementary assets for innovation, in&#13;
case medical devices. Top management initiated these explorative experiments and the learning was&#13;
utilized for expansion of the position within the core business. Hence, one can conclude that a&#13;
company should explore and utilize the value of complementary assets, since these are perfect tools&#13;
for strategic experimentation without risking the core business.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-05-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Optimal Levels of Embeddedness</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8352" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Vaarst Andersen, Kristina</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8352</id>
<updated>2011-10-13T07:45:26Z</updated>
<published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Optimal Levels of Embeddedness
Vaarst Andersen, Kristina
Co-location of industry professionals often leads to development of&#13;
collaboration networks, and multiple studies have emphasized the benefits of&#13;
embedded collaboration. Due to higher levels of trust, embedded collaboration&#13;
reduces transaction costs and facilitates ready knowledge exchanged. Other&#13;
studies have pointed to dangers of over-embeddedness. The argument is that&#13;
too high levels of embeddedness lead to habitual thinking, preferential&#13;
treatment, and thereby mitigate performance. However, research on the&#13;
conditions under which embeddedness in different types of collaboration&#13;
networks primarily yields costs or benefits still leaves much to be investigated....
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Emerging Strategies for Matching Distant Knowledge with Existing Innovation Capabilities</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8065" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stern, Alexander Brian</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8065</id>
<updated>2011-04-14T10:52:09Z</updated>
<published>2010-06-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Emerging Strategies for Matching Distant Knowledge with Existing Innovation Capabilities
Stern, Alexander Brian
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
