<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Working Papers (IKK)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/79" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/79</id>
<updated>2013-05-22T03:29:49Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-22T03:29:49Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Email Negotiation</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8239" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bülow, Anne Marie</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8239</id>
<updated>2011-05-25T09:16:12Z</updated>
<published>2011-01-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Email Negotiation
Bülow, Anne Marie
This paper investigates a set of email negotiations in order to explain a high number of deadlocks. The paper argues that one reason is the combination of cognitive effort characteristic of the e-mail genre, and the argumentative pattern found when two parties simultaneously try to persuade the other of the justice of their cause.&#13;
For a negotiation involving the wording of a contract, the evidence suggests that, while there is a distinct advantage in the features of reviewability and revisablity, the email format allows selective attention to the other party’s arguments, which can be shown to block suggestions and lead to sub-optimal results.
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Email in international negotiation</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7923" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bülow, Anne Marie</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7923</id>
<updated>2011-05-25T09:14:49Z</updated>
<published>2009-10-01T08:05:58Z</published>
<summary type="text">Email in international negotiation
Bülow, Anne Marie
This paper investigates the advantages and disadvantages of the use of email to obtain agreement between two parties with overlapping but also conflicting interests. The literature on Media Richness suggests that email is too lean to facilitate agreement; but all supporting evidence stems from homogenous populations. This paper, however, starts from the hypothesis that in connection with lingua franca interaction, the text format provides advantages for parties that need to think how to phrase an argument. However, the evidence provided from a negotiation task performed by international business students indicates that, while there is a distinct advantage in the feature of reviewability, the text format itself also poses a problem because it allows selective attention.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-10-01T08:05:58Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Diskurser er som floder af viden, der løber gennem tiden</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/6847" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fabech, Sidsel Grøn</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/6847</id>
<updated>2011-09-08T10:13:25Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Diskurser er som floder af viden, der løber gennem tiden
Fabech, Sidsel Grøn
Dette working paper præsenterer den tysk lingvist Siegfried Jägers diskursanalytiske metodeapparat i en dansk kontekst. Jägers diskurstilgang placerer sig mellem den kritiske diskursanalyse og diskursteorien. Med udgangspunkt i Foucaults diskursbegreb har Jäger udviklet en række konkrete begreber, analyseniveauer og analyseskridt, der er designet til at kortlægge diskursers historiske aspekter såvel som interdiskursive relationer. Jägers metodeapparat har således til formål at understøtte en multifacetteret analyse af særligt store samlinger af tekst og at afdække diskursive netværk hhv. kommunikationskulturer i deres helhed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
