<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Conference Papers (DBP)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8235" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8235</id>
<updated>2013-06-19T08:38:52Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-06-19T08:38:52Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Whatever Happened to New Public Management?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8548" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Greve, Crasten</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8548</id>
<updated>2012-10-24T11:45:06Z</updated>
<published>2012-10-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Whatever Happened to New Public Management?
Greve, Crasten
This paper aims to take stock of the concept of New Public Management (NPM) to see what has happened with the concept, and to consider recent concepts and ideas that challenge NPM. The reason is that there is still much talk about NPM, although many now seem to think that we have gone “beyond” NPM or are in a “post-NPM” public management situation. The second part of the paper will deal with self-styled conceptual alternatives to NPM. These began to appear in the last decade. With “self-styled” I mean that they explicitly present themselves as alternatives to NPM and address the shortcomings in NPM to promote other conceptualizations. Combined, these alternatives approach a coherent research agenda. To be able to discuss these matters, the argument is presented through a theoretical approach that views public management reform as institutional change. This approach is now common in public management reform studies (Pollitt &amp; Bouckaert 2004; Christensen &amp; Lægreid, 2001, 2007, 2011), Knill (1999) and Barzelay (2001) and colleagues (Barzelay &amp; Gallego 2010). The analytical framework comes from theories of public policymaking and theories of historical institutionalism in political science.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-10-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How do Domestic Institutions Influence Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8434" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Brown, Dana</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Steen Kundsen, Jette</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8434</id>
<updated>2012-03-28T13:18:04Z</updated>
<published>2012-03-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">How do Domestic Institutions Influence Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?
Brown, Dana; Steen Kundsen, Jette
The literature explains the link between CSR and domestic institutions in terms of the presence of national institutional complementarities as a key determinant of a company’s CSR initiatives. One set of explanations sees CSR as fitting in with domestic institutional structures as either `substituting’ or ‘mirroring’ government policies. A second set of explanations views CSR as driven by variations in competitive needs across countries, reflecting in particular the degree of international market exposure. Both sets of literature look at the level of CSR in companies from different countries. Focusing on the UK and Denmark we study the link between CSR and domestic institutions by examining the content of both government CSR policies and company CSR initiatives. We find that CSR can be a substitute for government regulation, but in contrast to&#13;
2&#13;
existing literatures we show that this is more likely in the context of host countries rather than in home countries.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-03-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Visible Hands</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8433" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Brown, Danna</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Steen Knudsen, Jette</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8433</id>
<updated>2012-03-28T13:20:00Z</updated>
<published>2012-03-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Visible Hands
Brown, Danna; Steen Knudsen, Jette
Do government policies on CSR in the UK and Denmark reflect distinct domestic political-economic institutional differences as predicted by the Varieties of Capitalism approach, or do they display new forms of governance that primarily address the needs of global businesses? We move beyond the management literature and the literature on public management of particular environmental and sustainability programs to explore a broader government agenda for CSR through a political science lens. We develop a set of expectations that follow from the literature on domestic institutions as well as from the literature that takes into account the role of governments in interaction with transnational actors. We find evidence for a substitution objective in the initial CSR programs of the Danish and British governments (and a mirror objective in Denmark). However, we also find that globalization has motivated governments to use their regulatory authorities pertaining to CSR policies for purposes beyond enhancement of welfare state functions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-03-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Looking out for the Moral Career</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8436" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Feldt, Liv Egholm</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8436</id>
<updated>2012-03-29T08:50:00Z</updated>
<published>2012-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Looking out for the Moral Career
Feldt, Liv Egholm
In the last decade, researchers have shown that MNCs need to reverse knowledge transfer to secure their competitiveness in the global market. Lately this has been studied through re/expatriates. This study presents two exemplary cases from a study of 64 interviews conducted in 5 of the largest Danish MNCs. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, to understand the role identity work plays in the ability and willingness of expatriates to learn and transfer knowledge. Second, to introduce Life Course Theory as an important methodological contribution with which to capture the entangled relationship between agency and structure within reverse knowledge transfer. Third, to develop and extend the current theoretical and methodological frame that govern the research of knowledge transfer. The present study indicates that institutionally generated organisational frames and work organising practices develop and feed certain power structures and communities, which influence the possibility of agency and as a result reverse knowledge transfer. The findings of this study stress that: 1) power is as an important productive force in identity work: consequently, it has the ability both to hinder and spur the processes of transformative learning and reverse knowledge transfer; 2) reverse knowledge transfer can be hindered by the lack of transformative learning in the single individual.&#13;
The empirical material in this paper has been collected in the research project ”Cultural Intelligence as a Strategic Resource”. The project was funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council and conducted by Lisbeth Clausen, Liv Egholm Feldt, Martine Cardel Gertsen, Anne-Marie Søderberg, Verner Worm and Mette Zølner, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark. The research team have had privileged access to five of the largest Danish MNCs. While the collection of material has in general been carried out by the research team, Liv Egholm Feldt is the only person responsible for the analysis, reflections and perspectives presented in this paper. To secure the anonymity of the interviewees, fictitious names have been used.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
