<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Conference papers (ITM)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8350" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8350</id>
<updated>2013-05-23T15:21:00Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-23T15:21:00Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Value of Open Government Data</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8621" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Jetzek, Thorhildur</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Avital, Michel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bjørn-Andersen, Niels</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8621</id>
<updated>2013-01-11T12:43:00Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Value of Open Government Data
Jetzek, Thorhildur; Avital, Michel; Bjørn-Andersen, Niels
Government data has been accumulated for centuries in protected repositories and registries as public&#13;
record and a matter of civil order. Recently, the Open Government Data (OGD) movement has emerged as&#13;
a group that focuses on facilitating open access to government data. Proponents of OGD initiatives argue&#13;
that it can strengthen democracy and improve government through increased participation, collaboration&#13;
and transparency. OGD advocates are also motivated by its potential contribution to greater productivity&#13;
and economic growth through increased government efficiency and the creation of new businesses and&#13;
services. However, as most OGD initiatives are relatively recent, the key questions regarding the value&#13;
propositions and return on investment of these initiatives remain unanswered. In this theory&#13;
development paper, we propose a strategic options framework that offers criteria for generating and&#13;
prioritizing OGD initiatives. The framework can guide structured analysis of the economic and social&#13;
impacts of OGD with an emphasis on its value propositions for both the public and private sectors.&#13;
Building on a literature review and fieldwork-based anecdotal evidence, we expect OGD initiatives to&#13;
generate value and substantial returns through increased transparency, efficiency of government&#13;
activities, citizen participation and entrepreneurial activity.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Gate-Keeping in the Age of Information Society</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8593" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Normann Andersen, Kim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Zinner Henriksen, Helle</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Medaglia, Rony</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hjerrild Carlsen, Mathilde</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sløk, Camilla</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8593</id>
<updated>2012-12-07T12:19:08Z</updated>
<published>2012-12-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Gate-Keeping in the Age of Information Society
Normann Andersen, Kim; Zinner Henriksen, Helle; Medaglia, Rony; Hjerrild Carlsen, Mathilde; Sløk, Camilla
Despite ten years of direct regulation, our study of Danish lower secondary schools shows that they do not provide online access to the GPA for individual public schools (N=1,592). Using Lipsky’s gate-keeping theory, we investigate the lack of data provision as indicator not only of professionals’ being reluctant to accept imposed standards and control from central level (top-down) but also avoiding demands from parents (and children) on transparency and accountability (bottom-up). The lack of accessibility of grades on the web can thus be seen as a classical gate-keeping mechanism evolving in the age of information society where expectations of end-of-gatekeeping by providing accessibility and transparency using information systems has been outnumbered by classical forces of gate-keeping.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-12-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Design Science Approach to Interactive Greenhouse Climate Control using Lego Mindstorms for Sensor- Intensive Prototyping</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8601" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ulslev Pedersen, Rasmus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Clemmensen, Torkil</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8601</id>
<updated>2012-12-17T12:58:20Z</updated>
<published>2012-12-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Design Science Approach to Interactive Greenhouse Climate Control using Lego Mindstorms for Sensor- Intensive Prototyping
Ulslev Pedersen, Rasmus; Clemmensen, Torkil
Clemmensen, Torkil
In this paper we present a case study of early prototyping work performed within a&#13;
Danish advanced technology project. We specifically investigate the problems and&#13;
issues related to throw-away prototypes in sensor-intensive systems. An important&#13;
criterion is to record and perhaps later reproduce the identified contributions of the&#13;
throw-away prototypes, and to this end we use the educational version of Lego&#13;
Mindstorms NXT. To achieve methodological rigor we have used the Design Science&#13;
Framework by Hevner et. al. It allows us to focus on the prototyping effort (called the&#13;
design cycle) without letting go of either the relevance or rigor related to the project.&#13;
We relate the case study to a Human Work Interaction Design (HWID) framework for&#13;
the use of interactive, sensor-intensive prototypes to develop interactive greenhouse&#13;
climate management systems. By applying guidelines suggested in design science to the&#13;
case studied, we identify a number of interactive prototypes that successively address&#13;
core issues in this particular setting. Finally, the problems and issues pertaining to this&#13;
setting is presented and identified. The main contribution of this paper is that it, by&#13;
pointing out problems and issues related throw-away prototyping with sensor-intensive&#13;
systems, extends the design cycle of the original design science framework. This is&#13;
determined to be a necessary step in order to address the inherent multi-disciplinarily of&#13;
sensor-intensive HWID systems.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Comparison of Card-sorting Analysis Methods</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8587" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nawaz, Ather</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8587</id>
<updated>2012-11-30T13:06:30Z</updated>
<published>2012-11-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Comparison of Card-sorting Analysis Methods
Nawaz, Ather
This study investigates how the choice of analysis method for card sorting studies affects the suggested information structure for websites. In the card sorting technique, a variety of methods are used to analyse the resulting data. The analysis of card sorting data helps user experience (UX) designers to discover the patterns in how users make classifications and thus to develop an optimal, user-centred website structure. During analysis, the recurrence of patterns of classification between users influences the resulting website structure. However, the algorithm used in the analysis influences the recurrent patterns found and thus has consequences for the resulting website design. This paper draws an attention to the choice of card sorting analysis and techniques and shows how it impacts the results. The research focuses on how the same data for card sorting can lead to different website structures by generating different set of classifications. It further explains how the agreement level between the users can change for similar data due to the choice of analysis.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-11-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
