<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Conference papers (IOA)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8409" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8409</id>
<updated>2013-05-25T03:09:24Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-25T03:09:24Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Predicate or subject?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8567" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Schmidt, Kjeld</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8567</id>
<updated>2012-11-16T10:01:13Z</updated>
<published>2012-11-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Predicate or subject?
Schmidt, Kjeld
In CSCW, phrases such as ‘shared goal’ or ‘shared understanding’ are often used to&#13;
denote what is taken to be a defining feature of cooperative work or at least what is&#13;
thought to be an essential precondition of the orderliness without which cooperative&#13;
work in practice is impossible; that is, these terms are used in an explanatory function&#13;
[e.g., 1; 6].&#13;
To take but one example: In one of her articles on ‘situation awareness’ the muchcited&#13;
Mica Endsley posits: ‘In a smoothly functioning team, each team member shares&#13;
a common understanding of what is happening on those [Situation Awareness] elements&#13;
that are common — that is, they have shared situation awareness, which refers&#13;
to the overlap among the SA requirements of the team members.’ However, she prudently&#13;
adds, ‘The concept of shared mental models is not universally heralded’ and&#13;
‘The development of shared mental models has not been the subject of much research’&#13;
[4, pp. 48, 52 f.].&#13;
A ‘shared situation awareness’? A ‘shared mental model’? What does she mean?
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-11-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Leadership and working life in Chinese businesses located in Denmark</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8645" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Westenholz, Ann</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8645</id>
<updated>2013-01-30T09:16:09Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Leadership and working life in Chinese businesses located in Denmark
Westenholz, Ann
Very little research – if any – has been done to find out what happens to leadership and working live when Chinese companies settle in Denmark. This paper argues that it is worth investigating this topic, as I assume that the numbers of Chinese companies locating themselves in Denmark will increase in the coming years. The aim of the paper is firstly to give an overview of the literature that deals with the development of Chinese companies going abroad, and it is shown that the direct outward investments of China is experiencing a rapid growth. Secondly I like to look at leadership and working lives in China, and the lesson learned from the literature is that leadership and working life in China is diverse and continuously evolving. But some trends may be identified like different institutional regimes and different types of companies. Thirdly I look at leadership and working life in Denmark, and I compare leadership and working life in the two countries showing that there are many differences. These differences may have an impact on the way Chinese companies handle their encounters with ‘strangers’ when they establish themselves abroad, but we do not know if this is happening. I conclude by outlining a way of how to empirically study the interaction between Chinese and Danish managers and employees working together in a Chinese company in Denmark.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Different worlds of organizing in Chinese companies located in Denmark</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8644" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Westenholz, Ann</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8644</id>
<updated>2013-01-30T09:03:29Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Different worlds of organizing in Chinese companies located in Denmark
Westenholz, Ann
Purpose: First, the aim is to clarify that it is worth investigating working life in Chinese companies located in Denmark. Second, I outline a way of how to empirically study the issue.&#13;
Design/methodology/approach: A literature review and a suggestion of how to study the issue.&#13;
Findings: There is a growing amount of literature dealing with Chinese and Western working life. The term ‘Western’ mostly refers to studies in North America. However the Danish way of organizing working life is not comparable to that of North America. I argue that we need to research the impact on working life in Denmark when Chinese companies settle in an institutional context like the Danish one. It is shown that Chinese institutional orders of organizing working life are very different to those in Denmark. I outline a method of how to empirically study the interaction between Chinese and Danish managers and employees working together in Chinese companies in Denmark. I argue that when these people work together, they also become engaged in institutional work dealing with the inconsistencies between the institutional orders of organizing. To study how institutional work emerges, I propose that we take inspiration from Boltanski and Thévenot’s theory of justification, different worlds, and different worth.&#13;
Research limitation: The empirical data gathering has just started and the analysis has yet to be conducted.&#13;
Practical implications: Even though the paper is not based on an empirical study, implications for studying how working life is organized in Chinese companies located in Denmark are suggested.&#13;
Keywords: Internationalization of Chinese companies. Institutional orders of working life in China and Denmark. Institutional work in Chinese companies settled in Denmark. Boltanski and Thévenot’s theory of justification, different worlds, and different worth.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Overstepping the Bounds</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8406" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Georg, Susse</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Garza de Linde, Gabriela</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Schweber, Libby</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sexton, Martin</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8406</id>
<updated>2012-02-10T13:01:13Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Overstepping the Bounds
Georg, Susse; Garza de Linde, Gabriela; Schweber, Libby; Sexton, Martin
The 2002 European Union (EU) directive on the energy performance of buildings&#13;
(Directive 2002/91/EC) set minimum standards on the energy performance of new&#13;
buildings and existing buildings. It also indicated that these would be subject to periodic&#13;
renovation. In some countries the directive supported policymakers in their bid for&#13;
national commitments to carbon reduction. In others, it affirmed existing commitments.&#13;
In most countries, it informed the ongoing reformulation of building regulations. This&#13;
paper explores energy related developments in building regulations for new housing in&#13;
Denmark (DK) and the United Kingdom (UK). The interest of the comparison lies in&#13;
similarities in the type of changes introduced into the regulations and differences in&#13;
industry responses.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-02-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
