<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Working Papers (IOA)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/87" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/87</id>
<updated>2013-05-26T00:47:05Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-26T00:47:05Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>What Makes Organization?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8554" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Boll, Karen</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8554</id>
<updated>2012-11-06T14:51:53Z</updated>
<published>2012-11-06T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">What Makes Organization?
Boll, Karen
This article investigates a segmentation model used by the Danish Tax and Customs&#13;
Administration to classify businesses’ motivational postures. The article uses two different&#13;
conceptualizations of performativity to analyze what the model’s segmentations do; Hacking’s&#13;
idea of making up people and MacKenzie’s idea of performativity. Based on these two approaches&#13;
I demonstrate that the segmentation model represents and performs the businesses as it ‘makes up’&#13;
certain new ways to be a business and as the businesses can be seen as ‘moving targets’. With&#13;
inspiration from MacKenzie my following argument is that the segmentation model posits a&#13;
remarkable cleverness in that it simultaneously alters what it represents and represents this&#13;
altered reality to confirm the accuracy of its own model of the businesses’ postures. However,&#13;
despite this cleverness the model bears a blind spot as it assumes a world wherein everything&#13;
around the model is in motion and can be shaped, whereas it believes itself to be stable. As&#13;
indicated in the article, this assumption turns out problematic as the tax administration questions&#13;
the model’s ability to produce valid comparisons. All in all, the article provides a detailed&#13;
description and analysis of the model’s performativity and provides an example of a&#13;
performativity study which in its methodology differs from the methodological criteria set up by&#13;
MacKenzie.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-11-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Talent retention in Danish film</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8004" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mathieu, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8004</id>
<updated>2010-01-22T01:01:25Z</updated>
<published>2010-01-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Talent retention in Danish film
Mathieu, Chris
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>What kind of ‘market’ are film labor markets?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7998" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mathieu, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7998</id>
<updated>2010-01-08T01:01:26Z</updated>
<published>2010-01-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">What kind of ‘market’ are film labor markets?
Mathieu, Chris
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-01-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Prækvalificering til arkitektkonkurrencer i Danmark</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7985" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kreiner, Kristian</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gorm, Majken Merete</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7985</id>
<updated>2009-12-22T01:01:29Z</updated>
<published>2009-12-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Prækvalificering til arkitektkonkurrencer i Danmark
Kreiner, Kristian; Gorm, Majken Merete
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-12-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
