A Four-Dimensional Product Innovativeness Typology

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

A Four-Dimensional Product Innovativeness Typology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rosenø, Axel en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-02-04T10:23:42Z
dc.date.available 2009-02-04T10:23:42Z
dc.date.issued 2005-01-03T00:00:00Z en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/6441
dc.description.abstract Product innovativeness is a key moderating variable for the study of innovation management (Song & Montoya-Weiss 1998, p. 124). For this reason, some empirical studies of innovation management examine new product processes, critical success factors, and market learning practices for incremental versus discontinuous new product projects (Song & Montoya-Weiss 1998; Atuahene-Gima 1995; Veryzer 1998a; Lynn et al. 1996; O’Connor 1998; Rice et al. 1998). By looking at both these types of new product development projects, empirical observations are likely to be more realistic than those of studies that do not discriminate between more or less innovative projects. Even so, a dualistic view of the matter does not capture the nuances (Green et al. 1995)1 of the relationship between product innovativeness and innovation management practices. Hence, there is a need for richer innovativeness typologies that go beyond the dichotomous view and, thereby, lend themselves to a more finegrained study of innovation management practices for different types of new product projects. In fact, various innovativeness typologies exist that include more than two product types. Notably, the typology by Booz, Allen & Hamilton (1982)2 introduces two dimensions: newness to the market and newness to the company, resulting in six products types (with various combinations of high, medium and low newness). An alternative set of typologies differentiates between the product’s technological newness and its market newness, for example Abernathy & Clark’s (1985) typology with four new product types; Leonard-Barton’s (1995) five product types; and Veryzer’s (1998a) four types in a two-by-two matrix. Interestingly, these two meta-perspectives on product innovativeness (i.e. 1. new to the market and/or new to the company and 2. technological and/or market newness) are generally not included within the same typology in extant literature. For example, discussions of the technological and/or market newness of a product, often leave out the question of whether that newness is in the eyes of the industry and market (exogenous newness) or only for the focal firm itself (endogenous newness). More broadly, it can be stated that "... little continuity exists in the new product literature regarding from whose perspective this degree of newness is viewed and what is new" (Garcia & Calantone 2002, p. 112). en_US
dc.format.extent 87 s. en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Working paper;2005-001 en_US
dc.subject.other produktudvikling en_US
dc.subject.other innovation en_US
dc.subject.other innovationsledelse en_US
dc.subject.other projektorganisation en_US
dc.title A Four-Dimensional Product Innovativeness Typology en_US
dc.type wp en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt05jan03 miel en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Informatik en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort INF en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Informatics en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort INF en_US
dc.idnumber x65645550x en_US
dc.publisher.city København en_US
dc.publisher.year 2005 en_US
dc.title.subtitle Introducing Seven New Product Project Types for the Study of Innovation Management en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
01-2005.pdf 2.560Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record