Harmonising auditors?

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

Harmonising auditors?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Loft, Anne en_US
dc.contributor.author Jeppesen, Kim K. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-02-04T10:24:31Z
dc.date.available 2009-02-04T10:24:31Z
dc.date.issued 2004-01-21T00:00:00Z en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/6739
dc.description.abstract This paper analyses the complex process through which EU's Eighth Company Law Directive on the qualification of statutory auditors (1984) was implemented in Denmark. The Directive envisaged one group of ‘statutory auditors’ in each member state. However, in Denmark there were two groups of auditors: the state authorised auditors who had a long education and high status, and the registered auditors who had a shorter education, lower status and whose clients were mainly medium and small sized businesses. An exemption was made in the Directive to allow the registered auditors to continue to audit despite that they did not have the required ‘university level’ education. This made the issue of education central to the long-term survival of the registered auditors and it consequently became the object of a long conflict between the parties with an interest in auditor education and qualifications: the profession, the state and the educational institutions. This case illustrates the processes of audit regulation in a small European state with a highly developed economy where auditors are approved and regulated by the state but through processes heavily influenced by the profession. It provides an interesting contrast to other studies carried out on the implementation of this Directive, e.g. in the UK (Cooper et al, 1996) and in Greece (Caramanis, 1999), and perhaps some insight into the difficulties which may be encountered in implementing the new Eighth Directive proposed by the Commission in May 2003. Key Words: EU; Eighth Directive; accounting profession; Denmark; harmonisation; regulation. en_US
dc.format.extent 30 s. en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries [Working paper];2003 en_US
dc.subject.other eu en_US
dc.subject.other selskabsret en_US
dc.subject.other revisorlovgivning en_US
dc.subject.other revisorer en_US
dc.subject.other danmark en_US
dc.title Harmonising auditors? en_US
dc.type wp en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt04jan21 mielmo en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Regnskab og Revision en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort RR en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Accounting and Auditing en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort AA
dc.idnumber x656378564 en_US
dc.publisher.city København en_US
dc.publisher.year 2003 en_US
dc.title.subtitle a case study of the implementation of the EU eigth directive in Denmark 1984-2003 en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
harmonising auditors loft og jeppesen.pdf 420.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record