| dc.contributor.author |
Sweeney, Richard J. |
en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2009-02-04T10:24:53Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2009-02-04T10:24:53Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2003-11-21T00:00:00Z |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10398/6806 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
The U.S. Constitution importantly limits the degree to which the federal government
can impose harmonization across member states. This paper reviews these limitations and
how they have evolved substantially over time in the U.S. It also discusses some of the
benefits and costs of such limitations, and argues that the EU may benefit from adopting
similar limitations. Harmonization of EU tax codes is likely to be economically harmful. On
theoretical grounds, tax rates are likely to be harmonized at a common rate that is higher than
optimal for the EU. This suggests the benefits of constitutional provisions that make tax
harmonization difficult to impose. Other types of harmonization have a less clear-cut costbenefit
analysis. A federal commercial code that is uniform across member states reduces
transaction and information costs, compared to leaving important code issues to member
states; further, many states may keep codes for long periods that are sub-optimal compared to
a given federal code. A federal code may, however, fit poorly with other institutions of
member states, potentially causing large costs. Leaving codes to the states leads to
competition across states, and may generate forces for change for the better. Competition also
generates information about the effectiveness and costs of different commercial codes.
Because any country’s initial code is likely to be sub-optimal, and is likely to become less
optimal over time, information on how to improve codes is valuable. Likely it is easier to
learn and adapt from member states than from other countries. |
en_US |
| dc.format.extent |
39 s. |
en_US |
| dc.language |
eng |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries |
LEFIC working paper;2003-11 |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
usa |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
føderalisme |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
skatteharmonisering-eu |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
eu |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Creeping Federalization |
en_US |
| dc.type |
wp |
en_US |
| dc.accessionstatus |
modt03nov21 inrumo |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.corporation |
Copenhagen Business School. CBS |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.department |
Institut for Finansiering |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentshort |
LEFIC |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentuk |
Department of Finance |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentukshort |
DF |
en_US |
| dc.idnumber |
x656312687 |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.city |
København |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.year |
2003 |
en_US |
| dc.title.subtitle |
Limits on Economic Harmonization in The United States and The European Union |
en_US |