|
Abstract:
|
The paper argues that society should vary the sanction applied to a
criminal defendant with the weight of the evidence against him or her.
This is optimal when it is costly for society to apply sanctions, since it can
yield the same degree of deterrence while requiring fewer resources to be
spent on sanctioning. Furthermore, when the unfairness of convicting an
innocent defendant increases with the size of the sanction, this provides a
further rationale for graduating sanctions with the probability of guilt.
Some objections are briefly discussed, mainly that it is inherently unfair
to apply different sanctions on people, who have committed the same
offense, and that the legal system will lose legitimacy if it allows sanctions
to vary in the way suggested. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
