| dc.contributor.author |
Yoguel, Yoguel, Novick, Anabel Novick, Marin |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-06-30 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-06-30T08:33:43Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-06-30T08:33:43Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2010-06-30 |
|
| dc.identifier.isbn |
87-7873-095-3 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8076 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
The purpose of this paper -as a part of a wider research project - is to analyze the
concept of production network from a methodological and theoretical viewpoint based
on a three-plane perspective. These dimensions are the linkages among agents, the
innovation activities, and the social management technology, including work process
organization and the social agreement generation model in force. It is an
experimentally methodological approach that tries to go from a theoretical
conceptualization of the phenomenon to its empirical evaluation.
The questions guiding this research are as follows:
9 What are the variables and dimensions to be observed in the analysis of a group of
interconnected firms in order to define a production network? Is it a unique
definition or, on the contrary, does it involve a range of alternatives? What are the
externalities generated by the agents who belong to one network?
9 What is the relationship between the network’s firms’ technological behavior and
their organizational counterpart? How are learning processes in the business firms
linked to their own training systems? Has the social management technology some
differential role in the learning process and in the development of skills? How do
knowledge transmission processes manifest themselves within the “network”?
9 What indicators are useful for the empirical identification of the different means
of manifestation of the network according to the theoretical viewpoint adopted?
How can those indicators be articulated in order to elaborate typologies intended
for the identification of “hybrid” models? How can a complex indicator be built in
order to show the different levels of circulation of intangible assets, development
of learning processes and work process organization?
In the first section, the conceptualization of the production “network” used in this
paper is discussed. In the second section, most relevant variables and indicators are
presented in order to feature the business firms and the network in terms of: a) type,
quantity and quality of tangible and intangible exchanges among the agents; b)
innovative capacity and learning; c) social management technology. Then we
elaborate a typology of networks based on the consideration of the previous
parameters. Lastly, in the fourth section, we discuss how the three dimensions interact
in the case of Volkswagen and his forty main local suppliers. |
en_US |
| dc.format.extent |
47 s. |
en_US |
| dc.language |
eng |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries |
DRUID;00-11 |
|
| dc.subject.other |
Innovation, production process, case study |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Production Networks: Linkages, Innovation processes and social management technologies |
en_US |
| dc.type |
wp |
en_US |
| dc.accessionstatus |
modt10jun30 siso |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.corporation |
Copenhagen Business School. CBS |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.department |
Institut for Innovation og Organisationsøkonomi |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentshort |
INO |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentuk |
Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentukshort |
INO |
en_US |
| dc.idnumber |
8778730953 |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.city |
Frederiksberg |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.year |
2000 |
en_US |
| dc.title.subtitle |
A methodological approach applied to the volkswagen case in Argentina |
en_US |