Strategy Research and

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author	J. Foss, Nicolai, Volker Mahnke
dc.date.accessioned	2010-06-30
dc.date.accessioned	2010-06-30T11:31:58Z
dc.date.available	2010-06-30T11:31:58Z
dc.date.issued	2010-06-30
dc.identifier.isbn	8778730686
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8093
dc.description.abstract	We argue that strategizing fundamentally concerns disequilibrium phenomena, such as discovery, innovation, resource-combination, imagination - in short, entrepreneurship. Therefore, the understanding of strategizing is likely to be led astray by drawing too heavily on equilibrium theories. Arguably, the three dominant economic approaches to strategy - the Porter industry analysis approach, the new industrial organization, and the ressourcebased approach - are characterized precisely by their strong reliance on equilibrium methodology. We argue that the market process approach in its Austrian version offers much inspiration for bringing process issues to bear on strategy issues.	en_US
dc.format.extent	40 s.	en_US
dc.language	eng	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	DRUID;1998-29
dc.subject.other	Strategy, organization, competitive advantage.	en_US
dc.title	Strategy Research and	en_US
dc.type	wp	en_US
dc.accessionstatus	modt10jun30 siso	en_US
dc.contributor.corporation	Copenhagen Business School. CBS	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Institut for Innovation og Organisationsøkonomi	en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort	INO	en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk	Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics	en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort	INO	en_US
dc.idnumber	8778730686	en_US
dc.publisher.city	København	en_US
dc.publisher.year	1998	en_US