Strategy Research and

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

Strategy Research and

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author J. Foss, Nicolai, Volker Mahnke
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-30
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-30T11:31:58Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-30T11:31:58Z
dc.date.issued 2010-06-30
dc.identifier.isbn 8778730686
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8093
dc.description.abstract We argue that strategizing fundamentally concerns disequilibrium phenomena, such as discovery, innovation, resource-combination, imagination - in short, entrepreneurship. Therefore, the understanding of strategizing is likely to be led astray by drawing too heavily on equilibrium theories. Arguably, the three dominant economic approaches to strategy - the Porter industry analysis approach, the new industrial organization, and the ressourcebased approach - are characterized precisely by their strong reliance on equilibrium methodology. We argue that the market process approach in its Austrian version offers much inspiration for bringing process issues to bear on strategy issues. en_US
dc.format.extent 40 s. en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries DRUID;1998-29
dc.subject.other Strategy, organization, competitive advantage. en_US
dc.title Strategy Research and en_US
dc.type wp en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt10jun30 siso en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Innovation og Organisationsøkonomi en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort INO en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort INO en_US
dc.idnumber 8778730686 en_US
dc.publisher.city København en_US
dc.publisher.year 1998 en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
8778730686.pdf 105.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record