From Diversity Management to Alterity Politics

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

From Diversity Management to Alterity Politics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Janssens, Maddy
dc.contributor.author Steyaert, Chris
dc.date.accessioned 2010-07-02
dc.date.accessioned 2010-07-02T11:01:57Z
dc.date.available 2010-07-02T11:01:57Z
dc.date.issued 2010-07-02
dc.identifier.isbn 8791023122
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8127
dc.description.abstract The diversity domain seems currently in a struggle, having critical debates about the future direction of diversity studies as well as diversity programs and actions. It seems to have neglected theoretical reflections on notions of ‘diversity,’ ‘difference,’ or the ‘other.’ The purpose of this paper is to think theoretically about diversity, arguing that it is the thinking itself that has to become different and that a different thinking will make a difference in addressing policies and actions. The main point we try to make is that diversity is not a matter of constructing identities but of a moving alterity. We will depart from the current debates in diversity management, in which we identify mainly four issues: a narrow or broad definition of diversity, a stable or dynamic conception of identity, the role of power, and the importance of the socio-historical context. With the discussion of these four issues, we will try to indicate the implicit ‘theoretical’ choices prioritizing the concept of ‘identity’, turning the issues of diversity into a managing of individuals and ‘their’ identities. Rather than pursuing the route of identity, we try to explore another route, paving a possible way of conceiving the other from the position of the other and not from fixed norms and possibilities. We therefor turn to the concept of ‘alterity.’ The aim of the paper is then to develop an alterity-thinking by connecting and relating to the philosophical work of Deleuze and Guattari, and Serres; the writings of Collins on the Black-feminist standpoint, and recent political studies on democracy. The qualifications that we connect and associate to alterity, are: its relation to an ontology of becoming, its crossing out of the identifiable into becoming anonymous, its dependence on safe, social-cultural spaces, and on open, empty public spaces. To conclude, we reflect on the different ways in which this alterity-thinking is related to the four critical issues of the diversity literature and discuss its qualifications as possible conditions for what we might sum up as an ‘alterity politics.’ en_US
dc.format.extent 31 s. en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.publisher Copenhagen Business School en_US
dc.title From Diversity Management to Alterity Politics en_US
dc.type wp en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt10jul02 siso en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Innovation og Organisationsøkonomi en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort INO en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort INO en_US
dc.idnumber 8791023122 en_US
dc.publisher.city k en_US
dc.publisher.year 1998 en_US
dc.title.subtitle Qualifying Otherness en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
8791023122.pdf 74.19Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record