The Expert-lay Controversy in Risk Research and Management

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

The Expert-lay Controversy in Risk Research and Management

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Merkelsen, Henrik
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-31
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-07T09:13:58Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-07T09:13:58Z
dc.date.issued 2011-04-07
dc.identifier.isbn 9788759384572
dc.identifier.issn 0906-6934
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8289
dc.description.abstract This thesis consists of four papers which address different aspects of risk. All the papers in the thesis relate one way or another to food risks, but food risks is not the core subject matter of the thesis. The overall theme is about how risks are defined, perceived, managed and communicated. However, the empirical focus on food risks is not a result of mere coincidence. During the past decades society has witnessed a number of food scares such as BSE, avian bird flu, E-Coli, Salmonella and Dioxin residues (Löfstedt 2006; Knowles 2007). New food risk topics related to novel foods and biotechnology such as GMO have added to the public concerns over food risks (Frewer et al. 2002; Sjöberg 2008). Obesity and other consequences of lifestyle related food risks cause severe health problems (Seiders 2004). Recently the growing concern about climate changes has led to significant public concern and media attention to the environmental impacts of food miles and green house gas emissions in food production (Weber and Matthews 2008). As a consequence of this development consumer concerns over food safety have increased steadily since the 1970s (Knox 2000). The sum of all these risks and the resulting societal anxiety are a politicization of food risks similar to that of risks related to new technologies. The politicization of food risks is accompanied by increased public demands for regulation, which, similar to the case of regulating new technologies, lead to the necessity of a better understanding of what factors drive public attitudes towards those risks. Subsequently the studies of public perceptions of 10 food risks have increased steadily over the past decades (Löfstedt 2006, Hohl and Gaskel 2008)). en_US
dc.format.extent 160 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Ph.d. serie; 5.2011
dc.title The Expert-lay Controversy in Risk Research and Management en_US
dc.type phd en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt11apr04 en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Internationale Kultur- og Kommunikationsstudier en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort IKK en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of International Culture and Communication Studies en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort IKK en_US
dc.idnumber x656703686 en_US
dc.publisher.city Frederiksberg en_US
dc.publisher.year 2011 en_US
dc.title.subtitle Effects of Institutional Distances. Studies of Risk Definitions, Perceptions, Management and Communication en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
Henrik_Merkelsen_2.pdf 3.262Mb PDF View/Open Ph.d. thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record