Managing Modularity of Service Processes Architecture

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

Managing Modularity of Service Processes Architecture

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Frandsen, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-06
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-08T11:53:23Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-08T11:53:23Z
dc.date.issued 2012-03-08
dc.identifier.isbn 9788792842459
dc.identifier.isbn 9788792842442
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8420
dc.description.abstract The world is increasingly turbulent with shorter and shorter technological life cycles and more and more frequent changes in customer demand. This situation implies that flexibility and agility are crucial for producers of products and services. Much effort has been directed toward understanding innovation and the ways in which management can increase the value of innovation efforts. As a consequence, suggestions emphasizing different aspects of innovation and creativity have been put forward. However, the value of architectural knowledge for innovation is increasingly recognized as crucial with modular architectures proposed as one way of increasing the rate of innovation by introducing flexibility and agility without sacrificing efficiency. Modularity is a way to design a system with the intent of reducing its complexity by decomposing the system and reducing interdependencies between the subsystems of the system through standardized interfaces. Systems designed in this way allow for greater flexibility through recombination; however, they retain efficiency by means of standardization and scale economies from the reuse of components. For this reason modular architectures present an interesting solution to the dilemma of whether to invest in innovation or in efficiency. The topic has received much attention in the face of demands from customers for increasingly heterogeneous products and services. However, an important aspect to keep in mind is that, while decomposition is a powerful way of reducing complexity, most real systems remain only nearly decomposable (Simon, 1962) or loosely coupled rather than uncoupled (Orton & Weick, 1990).... en_US
dc.format.extent 234 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.publisher Copenhagen Business School en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries PhD Series;9.2012
dc.title Managing Modularity of Service Processes Architecture en_US
dc.type phd en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt12mar08 lbjl en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Produktion og Erhvervsøkonomi en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort PEØ en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Operations Management en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort OM en_US
dc.idnumber 9788792842459 en_US
dc.publisher.city Frederiksberg en_US
dc.publisher.year 2012 en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
Thomas_Frandsen.pdf 6.550Mb PDF View/Open PhD afhandling

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record