CIT-PART

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author	Hansen, Janus
dc.date.accessioned	2011-11-16
dc.date.accessioned	2012-03-21T14:37:53Z
dc.date.available	2012-03-21T14:37:53Z
dc.date.issued	2012-03-21
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8430
dc.description.abstract	This paper reports the findings of the Danish case study on public debate, technology assessment and governance of xenotransplantation (XTP) conducted for the CIT-PART project (www.cit-part.at). The report is based on analysis of a range of different kinds of documents (newspaper reports, policy documents, research literature etc.) and 13 qualitative interviews conducted with persons engaged in different manners in the debates about XTP in Denmark such as scientists, regulators, politicians or technology assessment (TA) practitioners. The interviews were carried out in the period between November 2009 and September 2010. Furthermore, qualitative data material from an older study on public perceptions of biotechnology from 1999/2000 has briefly been revisited.	en_US
dc.format.extent	49	en_US
dc.language	eng	en_US
dc.publisher	CIT-PART	en_US
dc.title	CIT-PART	en_US
dc.type	rp	en_US
dc.accessionstatus	modt12mar21 lbjl	en_US
dc.contributor.corporation	Copenhagen Business School. CBS	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Department of Business and Politics	en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort	DBP	en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk	Department of Business and Politics	en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort	DBP	en_US
dc.description.notes	The project ―Impact of Citizen Participation on Decision-Making in a Knowledge Intensive Policy Field‖ (CIT-PART), Contract Number: SSH-CT-2008-225327, is funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme for Research – Socioeconomic Sciences and Humanities.	en_US
dc.idnumber	x656316550	en_US
dc.publisher.city	Frederiksberg	en_US
dc.publisher.year	2011	en_US
dc.title.subtitle	Report Case Study Denmark	en_US