| dc.contributor.author |
Crawford, Brett |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-05-30 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-05-30T11:46:00Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2012-05-30T11:46:00Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2012-05-30 |
|
| dc.identifier.isbn |
9788792842657 |
|
| dc.identifier.isbn |
9788792842640 |
|
| dc.identifier.issn |
0906-6934 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8452 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Much of the organizational institutionalism literature suggests that the
phenomenon of interests is a central construct, however, portrays interests in an overly
deterministic, rational, and liberal way. In this thesis, I challenge those views and
suggest that interests are a complex and interdependent socially constructed phenomenon.
Accordingly, interests represent an actor’s recognition, perceived importance, and
participation in a number of figurations and social games. Illustrated through the
institution of U.S. chambers of commerce, I explore how chambers of commerce have
withstood a changing American culture to become both the world’s largest business
federation and public-private partnership. Moreover, even as the United States
represents the most liberal of liberal market economies, chambers of commerce represent
a context where capitalists have set aside market competition and unified their interests to
become one of the largest and most influential institutions in the world.
Following a brief introduction of interests and chambers of commerce, this thesis
begins with the first paper, which is a critical review of the phenomenon of interests
within the organizational institutionalism literature. Tracing the conceptual variety of
both the origins and functions of interests in institutional studies, I illustrate how an
overly deterministic and rational view of interests is problematic. The critical review
continues with a discussion of my critiques of the extant literature followed by an
introduction of a less rational and calculative approach to interests by coupling
Bourdieu’s (1998) conceptualization of interests with Elias’s (1978) sociology
emphasizing figurations and social games. The three subsequent empirical papers test this approach to interests on macro-, meso-, and micro-levels of the institution of
chambers of commerce. |
en_US |
| dc.format.extent |
230 |
en_US |
| dc.language |
eng |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Copenhagen Business School |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries |
PhD Series;19.2012 |
|
| dc.title |
Revisiting the Phenomenon of Interests in Organizational Institutionalism |
en_US |
| dc.type |
phd |
en_US |
| dc.accessionstatus |
modt12maj30 lbjl |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.corporation |
Copenhagen Business School. CBS |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.department |
Department of Business and Politics |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentshort |
CBDS |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentuk |
Department of Business and Politics |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.departmentukshort |
DBP |
en_US |
| dc.idnumber |
9788792842657 |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.city |
Frederiksberg |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.year |
2012 |
en_US |
| dc.title.subtitle |
The Case of U.S. Chambers of Commerce |
en_US |