Reports (ICM/IKL) Titler
Foregående side
Viser 5-9 af i alt 9
-
Vorschlag für einen „Check Verbraucherpolitik und Verbraucherbeteiligung“Hagen, Kornelia; Micklitz, Hans-W.; Oehler, Andreas; Reisch, Lucia A.; Strünck, Christoph (Berlin, 2011)[Flere oplysninger][Færre oplysninger]
Resume: Wirken politische Maßnahmen so, wie sie sollen? Stehen Kosten und Nutzen solcher Maßnahmen in einem angemessenen Verhältnis? Die Forderung nach einer stärkeren empirischen Evidenz für die Bewertung und Planung politischer Maßnahmen kommt von verschiedenen Seiten. Anhänger einer stärkeren Deregulierung und Privatisierung fordern mehr Evidenz, weil sie skeptisch sind gegenüber staatlicher Regulierung. Lobbyismus- Kritiker fordern mehr Evidenz, weil sie damit den Einfluss von Interessengruppen sichtbar machen und zügeln wollen. Und Anhänger eines nachhaltigen, strategischen Konzepts glauben, dass politische Maßnahmen so weniger anfällig werden für die Hektik der Tagespolitik URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8400 Filer i denne post: 1
Lucia_A_Reisch_2011.pdf (1.016Mb) -
Kjærgaard, Annemette (Frederiksberg, 2012)[Flere oplysninger][Færre oplysninger]
Resume: Vi afholdt i efterårssemestret 2012 en fastholdelsesworkshop for de nye studerende på HA(it) med økonomisk støtte fra uddannelsesdekanen. I denne rapport vil vi kort gøre rede for forløbet samt de umiddelbare reaktioner fra de studerende som deltog. Det er først muligt at sammenligne tal for frafald med tidligere årgange til sommer 2013, når de studerende aktivt skal semestertilmelde sig, så denne rapport har ingen resultater ift fastholdelsesmålet. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8652 Filer i denne post: 1
Kjaergaard.pdf (1.317Mb) -
European Policymakers’ View on Sustainable User Innovation and EntrepreneurshipNielsen, Kristian Roed; Steensen Nielsen, Kristian; Reisch, Lucia A. (Frederiksberg, 2015)[Flere oplysninger][Færre oplysninger]
Resume: Good ideas and innovations are hard to spot and often come from the most unlikely of circumstances – once successful their value seems almost self-evident, but in the early stages a new idea or innovation remains largely anonymous and in dangerous waters. The growth of the Danish windmill industry was for example in the early stage hard to foresee. The utilization of wind power as a source of energy was not a novel concept in the 1970s when Riisager (a carpenter by trade) and others began to experiment with different turbine designs, nor was it a lucrative endeavor as it for many years remained, from a market perspective, unprofitable. Despite this, a small group of enthusiastic (and idealistic) individuals managed to dramatically improve existing designs, increasing the kW production of turbines from 15-30 kW in 1974-1979 to 180-450 kW by 1989. The success of the Danish wind turbine case was possible because multiple and diverse but interlinked actors tested varying designs in different locations, drawing both on their localized learningby- doing knowledge but also on the successes and failures of others. Step-by-step what had been a discarded idea for power production became the foundation of a large scale sustainable industry. The Danish windmill story has arguably become an oft-repeated story, but nonetheless it illustrates a key point: knowledge relevant for innovation is widely dispersed and is therefore typically outside the realm of any one individual, firm or organization. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10398/9306 Filer i denne post: 1
-
Mistra Future FashionGwozdz, Wencke; Netter, Sarah; Bjartmarz, Thordis; Reisch, Lucia A. (Frederiksberg, 2014)[Flere oplysninger][Færre oplysninger]
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10398/9022 Filer i denne post: 1
-
The Role of End-users and Policy Makers in Sustainable InnovationNielsen, Kristian Roed; Reisch, Lucia; Thøgersen, John (Frederiksberg, 2014)[Flere oplysninger][Færre oplysninger]
Resume: What is good sustainable innovation policy? And what is good governance for user-led innovation for more sustainable products and services in specific? The basic aim of innovation policy is to promote invention and innovation that transforms knowledge and competence into long-term social welfare. Innovation policy for sustainable development asks what can be done by government to support products, processes and social innovations that spur and enable more sustainable lifestyles in specific. From a policy maker’s perspective, there are two basic approaches to innovation policy: Either, governments engage into “horizontal industrial policy”, i.e. they design a supportive legal and economic framework, insure dynamic markets and promote a technology friendly “climate” in society. Or, governments engage in “vertical industrial policy” and opt for more active - and more intruding - efforts to develop an industry or a technology with economic incentives and industry-specific market regulation. This latter option has been criticized by market proponents since “picking the winners” by the state instead of the market is often not very efficient (“market knows best”). On the other hand, it has its merits in speeding up necessary changes in markets. Both approaches are, however, focused on entrepreneurs and industries, hence on the supply side of the market. In times of digitalization, prosumerism and blurring boundaries between supply and demand, another focus is slowly gaining importance, namely user-led innovation for sustainable products and processes. The present report hence focuses on the question how innovation policy can spur this kind of innovation with userentrepreneurs on the demand side of markets in the driver seat. The report identifies the key impact mechanisms as reported and analysed in the relevant literature. While admittedly this type of research is still scarce and in its infancy, we know from traditional innovation policy literature that good innovation governance • is consistent and reliable; • supports interaction between and offers platforms for all relevant actors: market actors (both: supply and demand), political actors, societal actors and science, also between venture capitalists and innovators/entrepreneurs; • designs a supportive innovation infrastructure (education, physical infrastructure, etc.); • supports a social “climate” that is open for innovation and has a culture for innovation and failure (willingness to change, open for new opportunity, trust in whom, culture of risk); • finds the right balance of regulation and free market; and • designs effective incentives and support programmes. This is also the starting point for the present report that focuses on the specific requirements of user-led sustainability innovation. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10398/9163 Filer i denne post: 1
Foregående side
Viser 5-9 af i alt 9