Union Jack


Show simple item record Hansen, Janus 2011-11-16 2012-03-21T14:37:53Z 2012-03-21T14:37:53Z 2012-03-21
dc.description.abstract This paper reports the findings of the Danish case study on public debate, technology assessment and governance of xenotransplantation (XTP) conducted for the CIT-PART project ( The report is based on analysis of a range of different kinds of documents (newspaper reports, policy documents, research literature etc.) and 13 qualitative interviews conducted with persons engaged in different manners in the debates about XTP in Denmark such as scientists, regulators, politicians or technology assessment (TA) practitioners. The interviews were carried out in the period between November 2009 and September 2010. Furthermore, qualitative data material from an older study on public perceptions of biotechnology from 1999/2000 has briefly been revisited. en_US
dc.format.extent 49 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.publisher CIT-PART en_US
dc.title CIT-PART en_US
dc.type rp en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt12mar21 lbjl en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Department of Business and Politics en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort DBP en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Business and Politics en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort DBP en_US
dc.description.notes The project ―Impact of Citizen Participation on Decision-Making in a Knowledge Intensive Policy Field‖ (CIT-PART), Contract Number: SSH-CT-2008-225327, is funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme for Research – Socioeconomic Sciences and Humanities. en_US
dc.idnumber x656316550 en_US Frederiksberg en_US
dc.publisher.year 2011 en_US
dc.title.subtitle Report Case Study Denmark en_US

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
Janus_Hansen.pdf 486.0Kb PDF View/Open Rapport

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record