Public procurement

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

Public procurement

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author la Cour, Lisbeth
dc.contributor.author Milhøj, Anders
dc.date.accessioned 2013-04-25
dc.date.accessioned 2013-04-30T12:51:16Z
dc.date.available 2013-04-30T12:51:16Z
dc.date.issued 2013-04-30
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8686
dc.description.abstract Public procurement is estimated to constitute more than 16% of GDP in the EU, see e.g. Ramsey (2006). This is one of the reasons why a lot of interest has been attached to this topic. Most of the papers in this field have been of a theoretical nature but during the last ten years also a few empirical studies have become available, see e.g. Marion, J. (2007) and Bajari et al (2008). At the EU level liberalizations have been going on since the late 80’ies (see e.g. the EU commission (1985). Here certain regulations imply that public projects of a certain size need to be subject to a public tender. Again according to Ramsey (2006) around 16% of all public procurement in the EU is subject to these rules and regulations and information on the contracts corresponding to these 16% can be found in Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) database. In general, the hypothesis is that public procurement will increase competition and ultimately lead to cheaper contracts for the authorities, see e.g. Cecchini (1988) for the economic arguments. But in practice: do the rules and regulations ensure more competition? Do they lead to more internationalization in the sense that more foreign firms become contract winners? Do the government and municipalities in the EU countries actually gain economically from the procurement? Does the choice of type of procedure matter? A lot of interesting questions immediately pops up and some of them – but only some of them - may be analyzed based on the content of this data base. Still, due to the large coverage and the international nature of the data base we believe that a thoroughly study of the possibilities of TED is of major interest and the present study is just a first step in this direction. One of the students who extracted the TED data has also used them for analysis in his master thesis, see Bundsgaard (2010). He has, however, limited his interest to analyze the choice of procedure: auction vs. negotiation and therefore our study has a broader scope when it comes to available variables. To our knowledge we are the first group of researchers who begins to analyze the content of this database using explorative statistical techniques based on a broad range of variables. en_US
dc.format.extent 18 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.title Public procurement en_US
dc.type cp en_US
dc.accessionstatus modt13apr30 lbjl en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Økonomisk Institut en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort ECON en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Economics en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort ECON en_US
dc.description.notes Preprint of conference paper published in Symposion i anvendt statistik: 28.-29. januar 2013. red. / Peter Linde. en_US
dc.publisher.city Frederiksberg en_US
dc.publisher.year 2013 en_US
dc.title.subtitle An explorative study of the contracts of the Tender Electronic Daily (TED) en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
Lisbeth la Cour_SYMP_13.pdf 168.5Kb PDF View/Open Conference paper

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record