Boundaries of Professionalization at Work


Union Jack

Boundaries of Professionalization at Work

Show simple item record Jensen, Maya Christiane Flensborg 2017-11-28T14:36:08Z 2017-11-28T14:36:08Z 2017-11-28
dc.identifier.isbn 9788793579507
dc.identifier.isbn 9788793579514
dc.identifier.issn 0906-6934
dc.description.abstract Within the last decade, rehabilitation has been promoted as a new professionalization opportunity within home care policy and practice in both Denmark and across Europe. Rehabilitation is said to reconfigure home care work in ways that result in improved working conditions, better quality of services, and cost savings. Rehabilitation is, however, only the most recent example of an ongoing range of new reforms and demands that have focused on professionalizing home care workers and their areas of work by imposing new professional structures, qualifications or status on the workers. And, yet, despite these ongoing processes of professionalization, home care workers, and care workers as such, continue to be socially, technically and economically marginalized at work. This paradox has increasingly encouraged in particular feminist-inspired academics (e.g., Sullivan, 2007; Cheney and Ashcraft, 2007) to question whether we have sufficiently understood the complexities and particularities of how professionalization processes are constituted and function at work. Their studies indicate that both definitions of “professionals” and the more material modes of organizing and doing “professional” work in the west tend to privilege some workers (i.e., white, white-collar, heterosexual males) and marginalize others, especially female workers who perform “dirty”, private household services for the aging or disabled, such as home care workers. Following these studies I take a critical stance against the so-called professionalization opportunities that are offered to home care workers with the introduction of rehabilitation in home care organizations. I ask what happens to the home care workers’ area of work and their risk of being socially, economically and technically marginalized, when they are confronted with the new opportunities to professionalize in rehabilitative home care organizations. en_US
dc.format.extent 276 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries PhD Series;39.2017
dc.title Boundaries of Professionalization at Work en_US
dc.type phd en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Institut for Organisation en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort IOA en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Department of Organization en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort OIS en_US Frederiksberg en_US
dc.publisher.year 2017 en_US
dc.title.subtitle An Ethnography-inspired Study of Care Workers’ Dilemmas at the Margin en_US

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
Maya Flensborg Jensen.pdf 6.538Mb PDF View/Open Phd-afhandling

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record