Discourses on Philosophies of Science in International Business Studies

OPEN ARCHIVE

Union Jack
Dannebrog

Discourses on Philosophies of Science in International Business Studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jakobsen, Michael
dc.contributor.author Worm, Verner
dc.date.accessioned 2018-02-09T07:45:37Z
dc.date.available 2018-02-09T07:45:37Z
dc.date.issued 2018-02-09
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10398/9590
dc.description.abstract International business (IB) studies revolve around two key perspectives that can be defined as a firm specific perspective and a generic perspective that combined provide a company with crucial insights into how to enter and navigate a foreign market. Combined, such an approach provides a company with a holistic perception of what kind of resources and capabilities that are needed when entering a specific market as well as what to expect of the host market that the company is planning to enter. The key issue here is how to design a research strategy that is to provide the analyst with data that makes him or her capable of developing a pertinent explanatory framework for how to engage a foreign market. Before starting to look for appropriate research methodologies and tools for data collection, however, a pertinent philosophy of science point of departure has to be selected. This article has chosen to discuss three different philosophies of science. Each one of them is capable of providing the analyst with a specific take on how to ‘think’ data that are being extracted. Arguably, whatever approach one selects, the choice will have a crucial impact on the outcome of the research process. After settling down on a specific philosophical of science the article moves on to apply this on the Danish shipping company Maersk Line. The key focus here is on how employees at headquarter and in selected subsidiaries ‘read’ the company’s global corporate culture so as to be able to navigate this particular company to their own benefit as well as to the company’ per se. The article closes with a critical discussion of the ramification of selecting one philosophy of science over another when engaging in either qualitative or quantitative research in an IB context. en_US
dc.format.extent 30 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.publisher Asia Research Centre en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Copenhagen Discussion Papers;65
dc.subject.other International Business en_US
dc.subject.other Positivism en_US
dc.subject.other Structuralism en_US
dc.subject.other Phenomenology en_US
dc.subject.other Qualitative and Quantitative Research en_US
dc.subject.other Maersk Line en_US
dc.subject.other Global Corporate Culture en_US
dc.subject.other Employees en_US
dc.title Discourses on Philosophies of Science in International Business Studies en_US
dc.type wp en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.department Asia Research Centre en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort ARC en_US
dc.contributor.departmentuk Asia Research Centre en_US
dc.contributor.departmentukshort ARC en_US
dc.publisher.city Frederiksberg en_US
dc.publisher.year 2018 en_US
dc.title.subtitle Perspectives and Consequences en_US


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Files Size Format View
cdp_2018-65.pdf 231.7Kb PDF View/Open Working paper

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record